Policy


  1. Introduction

The Dialogue Social Science Review (DSSR) is committed to fostering rigorous, ethical, and inclusive dialogue in the field of social science research. This policy outlines the principles, guidelines, and procedures governing the submission, review, and publication process within DSSR.

  1. Scope

This policy applies to all submissions to DSSR, including but not limited to research articles, review articles, opinion pieces, and commentaries in the field of social science.

  1. Ethical Standards
  2. Research Integrity: Authors are expected to conduct research with integrity, adhering to ethical guidelines and standards set forth by relevant institutions and professional bodies.
  3. Plagiarism: Plagiarism in any form is unacceptable. Authors must ensure that their submissions are original and properly cite sources when using the work or ideas of others.
  4. Conflict of Interest: Authors should disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may influence the research or its interpretation. Editors will handle conflicts of interest with transparency and objectivity.
  5. Submission Guidelines
  6. Formatting: Submissions must adhere to the formatting guidelines specified by DSSR. These guidelines typically include font style, font size, spacing, citation style, and manuscript structure.
  7. Language: Manuscripts should be written in clear, concise, and grammatically correct language. Authors whose native language is not English are encouraged to seek language editing assistance before submission.
  8. Length: Manuscripts should be of appropriate length to convey the research effectively while maintaining reader engagement. Excessive length may be grounds for rejection or request for revision.
  9. Peer Review Process
  10. Double-Blind Review: DSSR employs a double-blind peer review process, wherein the identities of both the authors and the reviewers are concealed from each other. This ensures impartial evaluation of the manuscript based solely on its academic merit.
  11. Reviewer Selection: Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and experience in the relevant field of study. They are expected to provide constructive feedback to authors and assist the editorial team in determining the suitability of the manuscript for publication.
  12. Review Criteria: Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on criteria such as originality, significance, methodology, clarity, and adherence to ethical standards. Feedback provided should be specific, objective, and respectful.
  13. Editorial Decision
  14. Acceptance Criteria: Manuscripts accepted for publication in DSSR must demonstrate scholarly excellence, contribute significantly to the advancement of knowledge in the field of social science, and align with the journal's scope and mission.
  15. Decision Categories: Editorial decisions may include acceptance, revision with minor/major changes, or rejection. Authors will be notified of the decision along with reviewer comments and recommendations.
  16. Copyright and Licensing
  17. Copyright: Authors retain the copyright to their work published in DSSR. However, by submitting their manuscript, authors grant DSSR the right to publish, reproduce, distribute, and sublicense the work.
  18. Licensing: DSSR typically adopts an open-access model, allowing readers to access and use published content freely, provided proper attribution is given to the authors.
  19. Appeals and Corrections
  20. Appeals: Authors may appeal editorial decisions if they believe there has been a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of their work. Appeals will be reviewed by the editorial board, and decisions will be communicated to the authors in a timely manner.
  21. Corrections: If errors or inaccuracies are identified in published work, authors are encouraged to notify the editorial team promptly. Corrections will be issued following appropriate review and verification.
  22. Editorial Independence
  23. Conflict of Interest: Editors and reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may influence their judgment. Editorial decisions are made independently, without undue influence from external parties.
  24. Editorial Integrity: DSSR is committed to upholding editorial integrity and transparency. Editors will handle all submissions impartially and objectively, regardless of the author's affiliation or reputation.
  25. Revision of Policy

This policy is subject to periodic review and revision to ensure alignment with evolving standards and best practices in scholarly publishing. Any updates or amendments to the policy will be communicated to authors, reviewers, and readers through appropriate channels.

  1. Conclusion

The Dialogue Social Science Review (DSSR) policy is designed to uphold the highest standards of scholarly integrity, transparency, and inclusivity in social science research. Authors, reviewers, editors, and readers are expected to adhere to these guidelines to maintain the quality and credibility of published work in DSSR.